Page 19 of 33
Case Comment: Choice of Language and Commercial Expression Under s. 2(b) of the Canadian Charter
| Type of resource | |
|---|---|
| Author/collaborator |
|
| Title |
Case Comment: Choice of Language and Commercial Expression Under s. 2(b) of the Canadian Charter
|
| Abstract |
A case study of the 1988 legal decision in "Ford v. A.G. Quebec" in which the Supreme Court of Canada in a unanimous decision held that Bill 101 provisions on the language of signs infringed on the free expression and the non-discrimination provisions of the Quebec Charter of Human Rights and Freedoms and the Constitutional Act (1982).
|
| Publication |
British Journal of Canadian Studies
|
| Volume |
Vol. 4
|
| Issue |
no. 1
|
| Pages |
1-11
|
| Date |
1989
|
| Language |
en
|
| Citation |
Belcher, Ruth C. “Case Comment: Choice of Language and Commercial Expression Under s. 2(b) of the Canadian Charter.” British Journal of Canadian Studies Vol. 4, no. 1 (1989): 1–11.
|
| Find in a library | |
| Permalink |
Page 19 of 33
